Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Why Did They Vote That Way

November 10, 2024

I’ve been contemplating why so many people could vote against their own best interests. First, it occurred to me that you don’t really need a lot of voters to sway each election. Elections are won/lost in the margins which often are very few votes one way or the other. My Texas county (Brewster) has 7,408 registered voters. In the Prez race the difference between Red and Blue was only 571, slightly under 8%. And a recent County Commission race was decided by a margin of 13 votes and there were 30 ballots with no vote at all. And look at how Senate and House races across the country are down to the wire.

Well, given that, how do you sway the marginal voters? One answer: You lie to a lot of people with constant, loud, emotion-packed lies. Anyone we know?

Second, you control the sources of information. In these days we like to call the “The Information Age,” local newspapers have gone away, cable is collapsing and much of the printwaves and airwaves are dominated by entertaining music and sports. There’s precious little in the way of useful info that guides folks on policies that directly affect their lives enacted at the federal, state and local level. It is a fact that in this election the Republican vote was strongly associated with belief in several pieces of serious misinformation. For example, Trump proposes raising “tariffs” on imported goods, lying that it will bring in money from the importing country; the truth is that they are sales taxes paid by American importers and the customers, thus raising the price of those goods. They are inflationary and hurt consumers. Another big example for us in Texas is the claim that immigrants are an “invasion” taking jobs away from citizens and costing taxpayers to provide for them. Actually, immigration creates more jobs than it endangers and they contribute more to the economy than they cost. We need immigrants in our labor force and deporting large numbers of them would devastate our economy and our society.

As Mark Twain once said, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” That seems to apply to our nation, state and even more so to rural counties.

Third, you suppress voting by your opponents by several means, such as gerrymandering, limiting public voting directly on issues (called Initiative), kicking people off the voter registration rolls, restricting information about candidates and complicating processes to cast a vote, etc ad nauseum. Again, anybody we know? Memo to Greg Abbott: There is virtually no problem of noncitizens voting in our elections. It’s all a lie!

Finally, you give money to people to get them to vote how you want. It’s illegal and arguably immoral, but Texas’ tradition of patronage election is on steroids. As it is said with a German accent “Ve have vays” (of getting you to vote our way). Elon Musk just bought himself a Country we all like to consider our own. Go back to my first statement and contemplate how many employees he directly or indirectly controls in Texas and across the country. Nor is he alone since Big Oil and Gas has ruled Texas for decades using the same playbook. They identified the places where the marginal vote could be swayed in their favor and set about changing the direction of the margin. That’s the real “Infowar” they run with help from “Mother Russia.” Trump was right about one thing – it was a rigged election, by whom and for whom we are just starting to find out.

This, of course, is what happened to Germany in the last century that caused her own downfall and worldwide carnage. It’s autocracy of, by and for the oligarchs, a nation wherein the policies and actions of the government are against the will of her own people. What could possibly go wrong? Sadly, we may soon see and we should prepare with our own playbook, and be prepared to protect and help those who will suffer under this regime.

Now and Then, Now as Then

March 13, 2024

Look again at that date.  I’m currently working on a project to preserve the legacy of my parents, Dr W.E. Lockhart Jr, MD and Lora Bell Kunze Lockhart, who provided health care and civic improvements in the Big Bend area of Texas for over 50 years from 1936 to 1998.  I’m currently reading and transcribing letters sent to and fro when he served in the 30th Evacuation Hospital in New Guinea and the Philippines in World War II.  In the midst of reading, I suddenly realized their concerns were exactly as ours are 80 YEARS later — almost to the day!  And the situation they faced then was EXACTLY as we are facing today.

In their day, the authoritarian and fascist dictators had invaded European democracies and sovereign nations in the Pacific, murdered civilians and enacted despotic repression.  There were authoritarian movements afoot within the United States as well.  However, our Nation took on those despots in World War II and won!  In our day, authoritarian regimes have invaded and repressed the European democracy of Ukraine, threaten sovereign nations in the Pacific and have assumed power in weakened nations in Africa and South America.  And within the United States, authoritarian “regimes” have taken power in at least two states, Florida and Texas.  There is an authoritarian faction at work in one of our major political parties, but so far the Nation as a whole is committed to stopping today’s “barbarians at the gate.”  So far!

What these authoritarian regimes had then and have now in common is a refusal to accept the natural EQUALITY of all human beings.  Lacking acceptance of equality, they have no EMPATHY for others and enact cruel and repressive laws against the wishes of their own people.  Because they don’t see others as their equal, they deny a RIGHT to PRIVACY in human behavior.  They exhibit HATRED toward immigrants and other less-powerful people.  They repudiate the EQUAL PROTECTION in the RULE OF LAW and they deny or suppress DEMOCRACY, especially the RIGHT TO VOTE whereby the people can guide their government to meet their needs.

In a “V-mail” (the wartime format for letters) dated October 16, 1943, Lora Bell Lockhart wrote to her husband: “I am reading a book … ‘Prelude to Victory’ by a reporter named James B. Reston.  I like lots he says and so far the main thesis seems to be that we have underestimated the price of freedom, and this quotation of Goethe in the front is apt I think.  ‘That which thy fathers have bequeathed to thee, earn it anew if thou wouldst possess it.’  This habit of taking the easiest way out of everything surely left our country in an embarrassing position these last few years.  The thing starts right at home though when we find out that only 13 people [in Alpine, Texas] voted in the last election for school board members.  And what could be more important here to us?  I believe the position of education in this country is one most pitiful and one of the most important for people like you and me to do something about.  So far I think it has been only the teachers who have been concerned over education bills which come before legislatures.”

The Evacuation Hospital Dr Lockhart served with moved from site to site in New Guinea and the Philippines behind the battle lines.  Their patients included wounded American and allied soldiers and Japanese prisoners of war.  Beyond healing war wounds, they provided care for minor things like foot infections, for tropical diseases and emergency appendectomies.  Throughout his experience he wrote home reflecting on his thoughts about human existence, what he was experiencing in war and his duty to care for all his patients.

In a V-mail on January 20, 1944, he took on those in Christianity who focus on minor things like whether Mary was a virgin or not and “miracles” of Christ, while missing the essential premise of the religion.  He said, “The real central principle in Christianity lies in the biological fact that members of a species are naturally the greatest enemy of the individuals within that species, because of identical desires and needs.  If by sympathy and understanding this conflict could be neutralized in man, almost unlimited progress would follow.  Just as one time Nature designed a cerebral cortex for man:  so now is emerging a new plan.”

On February 13, 1944, Dr Lockhart wrote, “I saw a POW while ago.  Poor fellow, nearly starved.  He is lucky.  He will be well cared for and restored to health.  I can’t help feeling sorry for many of these …. individuals – more or less peons, forced into the war by propaganda, pride, religion – and force.”  Until he returned from World War II in January of 1946, he gave equal consideration and care to those he saw as “the least among us,” and after arriving home the Lockharts dedicated their lives to equal health care for all and civic improvements such as hospitals, safe water supplies and infrastructure in the Big Bend region.

For both Dr and Mrs. Lockhart the essence of Christianity was expressed in Matthew 25:40, “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” This is a fundamental acceptance of the EQUALITY, the equal worth, of all individual humans.  We often hear, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” or “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”  This principle is not just found in Christianity, it is a common theme in other religious faiths and is central to the ethics of those who hold no specific religious faith. 

Furthermore, this principle of EQUALITY is firmly established in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and its Amendments as ratified by The People. Standing on the Gettysburg battlefield in 1984, President Lincoln said, Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

In the Christmas season, we recalled the words of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow:

I heard the bells on Christmas Day their old, familiar carols play,

And wild and sweet the words repeat of Peace on Earth, Good Will to Men!

….

And in despair I bowed my head; “There is no peace on earth,” I said;

“For hate is strong, and mocks the song of peace on earth, good will to men!”

Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:  “God is not dead, nor doth He sleep:

The Wrong shall fail, The Right prevail, With peace on earth, good will to men.”

Now, comes the election season of 2024, arguably the most important elections of our lifetime.  For two intertwined reasons today’s advancement of authoritarian rule is more dangerous than in the 1930s-40s.  Our planet is rapidly warming due to the use of fossil fuels and fossil fuel profits are funding authoritarian movements in an effort to prevent us from transitioning away from their use.

We can’t wait until directly attacked militarily as they did in WWII. “We, the People” are already under attack here at home, especially in Texas and by our own government.  If we would have “the Wrong fail” and “the Right prevail” we have to use the one tool left to us, our DEMOCRACY, and vote like our lives depend on it.  Because they do! 

However, here is a key that may help in choosing our government leaders:  Look for those who, instead of spouting rhetoric of “liberty” and “freedom” while attacking immigrants and other powerless people, believe in EQUALITY and who have accomplished or propose public policies that reinforce that natural fact.  Look for and vote for those people who are, as President Lincoln said, “…dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

Democracy is a “use it or lose it” proposition. Remember Goethe’s wise words:  “That which thy fathers have bequeathed to thee, earn it anew if thou wouldst possess it.” 

Political Polarization and Slippage of Time

August 17, 2014

The editor of my hometown newspaper claimed that today’s political polarization was the result of extremists on the right and left. She also claimed that those seeking to address climate change were the extremists on the left, comparable to Sarah Palin on the right. Then she asked for rebuttal, but would only allow 400 words in that rebuttal. So I sent a drastically cut-down version to her paper and post the full response here.

I’ll bite on Alpine Avalanche Editor Lisa Hannon’s invitation for alternative views to her description of the political polarization of today. Serious analyses have been done regarding this subject which clearly show a distinct movement farther to the right by Republicans and little or no movement to the left by Democrats.

I recommend reading “It’s Even Worse Than It Looks” by Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution and Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute. These serious political analysts, one on the left and one on the right, agreed that movement rightward by Republicans is the core polarizing factor. They described today’s Republican Party as “…an insurgent outlier- ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition”. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glen Beck, Dan Patrick, Tom Tancredo, townhall.com, Fox News, World Net Daily, etc., all cases on point! No one on the left is in any way comparable to those on the extreme right who have taken control of our media and the Republican Party.

And I don’t say that with pleasure. I grew up in Alpine at a time when liberals and conservatives took each other to dinner and argued politics ‘til the cows came home yet stayed close friends. They agreed that we needed good government that served the needs of the people; they just disagreed about how to do it. They didn’t demonize anyone and they didn’t shout and talk over others to make their point. Above all, they both believed in science and education and accepted facts. I would love for the Republicans to pull back from extremism, not just because it would make life more sociable and fun, but also because we are all in this life together.

The Editor presented a false equivalency between Sarah Palin and those who insist or dealing with human-caused global climate change. Really? Are the highly educated climate scientists, over 90% of whom agree about climate change, extremists? Science told us too many were dying in car wrecks. We regulated vehicle safety and it worked to reduce the carnage. They said we could go to the moon and we did. They said industrial emissions were causing acid rain; we changed the regs and reduced it. They gave us antibiotics, heart transplants, television, computers and mobile phones. Science and scientists have been right so many times, we should not bet our children’s and grand-children’s future that they are finally wrong about something.

The claim that global climate change couldn’t be a real crisis for us today because at certain times in its history the planet has been warmer or colder leaves out this simple fact: When the earth was at those different temperatures it was not a climate suitable for humans, plants and animals as they exist today. It is not extremist to be very worried about the global effects of the industrial revolution and use of fossil fuels. It’s just plain common sense.

So, where are the extremists of the left that Editor Hannon equates with the right? They don’t exist. Furthermore, scholars of income inequity and societal health have found that, wherever the gap widens between the few at the top of the scale and the many below, this polarization, with it’s distrust, demonization, denial and division, results. Polarization is entirely predictable by our extremely inequitable economy which today is the worst ever in America and worse among Southern states governed by Republicans (like Texas). I wrote an article in 2012 based on the worldwide research finding regarding income inequity which readers can find in books such as “The Spirit Level” (Wilkinson and Pickett), “The Health of Nations: Why Inequality is Harmful to Your Health” (Kawachi and Kennedy), and “The Impact of Inequality” (Wilkinson). By the way, the time I spoke of with nostalgia above was also a time to LOW income inequity and a growing middle class in America.

Ironically, political polarization becomes the major obstacle to reducing income inequity and thus feeds a downward spiral in society. There are actions our government could take right now to reduce economic inequity, but extremists on the right fiercely obstruct them. Why? Because those extremists in the media and politics are funded and supported by those at the top of the economic food chain – billionaires, banksters, multi-national corporations, fossil fuel industrialists – who do not want to see action taken to reduce either economic inequity or global climate change.

This is why I hope thoughtful Republicans and other conservatives will recognize that polarization exists, reject extremists in their midst, and return to seeking real solutions to our considerable problems. “Time keeps on slipping into the future” (Steve Miller Band); the question is will humans be there to see it?